Resolving SSL Certificate Chain Trust Issues in Nessus Scan: Self-Signed Certificates

Overview

In this lab, I performed a vulnerability scan using Tenable Nessus Essentials, which flagged an issue related to SSL certificate trust. The scan identified that the X.509 certificate for a remote service could not be trusted due to a broken certificate chain. Specifically, the certificate was issued by an unknown Certificate Authority (CA) because it was self-signed.

Initial Scan

Nessus flagged an “SSL Certificate Cannot Be Trusted” vulnerability during the scan.

  • The certificate chain was broken because the remote host sent a certificate signed by an unknown CA.
  • The affected certificate was issued by a self-signed FileZilla Server certificate.

SSL Certificate Issue

The Nessus scan results highlighted an issue with the SSL certificate.

Detailed Investigation

The Nessus scan revealed the following certificate details:

  • Subject: CN=filezilla-server self-signed certificate
  • Issuer: CN=filezilla-server self-signed certificate

Both the subject and issuer were identical, confirming that the certificate was self-signed and not recognized by the system’s trusted certificate authorities.

This is common in services like FileZilla Server, which generate self-signed certificates instead of obtaining one from a trusted CA.

Implications

While this issue was not critical in a lab environment, it could lead to trust issues with clients connecting to the service in a production setting.

  • The absence of a trusted CA makes it easier for attackers to impersonate the server and conduct man-in-the-middle (MITM) attacks.
  • This could lead to the compromise of sensitive data.

Resolution

Since this issue stemmed from FileZilla Server’s self-signed certificate, I explored possible resolutions:

  1. Lab Environment Solution:
    • Add the self-signed certificate to the local trust store for internal use.
  2. Production Environment Best Practice:
    • Replace the self-signed certificate with one issued by a trusted CA to avoid trust-related issues and enhance security.

Troubleshooting

Nessus flagged the certificate because it could not verify the certificate chain without a valid CA at the top.

  • Once I identified the root cause of the self-signed FileZilla certificate, I understood this was a common finding in a lab setup.

Outcome

  • In my lab setup, this vulnerability did not pose a serious security risk.
  • In a real-world environment, replacing the self-signed certificate with one from a trusted CA would be the recommended fix to prevent trust issues and potential MITM attacks.

Tools Used

  • Tenable Nessus Essentials
  • Command-line tools (e.g., ipconfig for networking)

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *